Archive for June, 2018
» posted on Thursday, June 28th, 2018 at 5:55 pm by admin
Evan Frayman, who is running for Circuit Judge, Group 45, was just endorsed by Pinellas County Commissioner Kenneth T. Welch, and Pasco Commissioner Jack Mariano. Frayman has impressively racked up a long list of major endorsements in addition to these two government leaders.
Ken Burke, CPA, Pinellas Clerk of the Circuit Court
Bob Dillinger, Public Defender, Sixth Judicial Circuit
Mike Fasano, Pasco County Tax Collector
Charlie Gerdes, Esq., St. Petersburg City Council
Bob Gualtieri, Pinellas County Sheriff
Gary Joiner, Pasco County Property Appraiser
Rick Kriseman, Mayor of St. Petersburg
Chris Nocco, Pasco County Sheriff
Ronald E. Oakley, Pasco County Commissioner and Vice Chair
Paula S. O’Neil, Ph.D., Clerk & Comptroller Pasco County
Karen Seel, Pinellas County Commissioner
Charles W. Thomas, CFC, CPM, Pinellas County Tax Collector
Mike Twitty, MAI, Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Joshua Chilson, Esq., Florida Bar Board of Governors
Hon. Irene Sullivan, Retired Circuit Judge
Matthew W. Kindel, Esq., President, West Pasco Bar Association
Fraternal Order of Police, Pasco County Sheriff’s Lodge 29
Dave Eggers Pinellas County Commissioner
Comments Off on Evan Frayman, who is running for Circuit Court, Group 45, Continues to Receive Major Endorsements | filed under Justice System
» posted on Friday, June 15th, 2018 at 5:10 pm by admin
Yesterday, Florida You Judge (“FYJ”) emailed the below communication to Jane Castor. Should Jane Castor care to respond to readers/voters, this blog will supplement the post with her reaction.
You retired as chief of Tampa police in 2015. You then began a consulting firm, Castor Consulting. Between the years 2010-11, the Miami Police Depart killed 7 black men within a period of 8 months. The New York Times published an article about it, Race Issues Rise for Miami Police. As a result of the death of these 7 black men, the Miami Police Department entered into a policing agreement with the DOJ on Feb 25, 2016allowing the FEDS to police them to ensure no more black men unnecessarily die. You were chosen by the city of Miami to monitor this agreement at 125K (not to exceed) a year ($150 an hour) of taxpayer money. You signed your monitoring contract on April 7, 2016 and the same was notarized on April 28, 2016. This contract you signed obligated you to submit quarterly reports, so at the time you signed the contract in April you were supposed to thereafter submit reports for Julyand November of 2016. The Miami Herald made a public records request for these reports and it learned that you had not submitted them and in a December 2016 article it headlined the story, “Former Tampa chief Jane Castor ‘behind schedule’ as monitor of Miami’s federal policing pact” The article stated:
“Nine months after the city and federal government came to terms on the hard-fought compact, the consultant hired to look over the department’s shoulder is way behind schedule. Though her first public report was to be issued July 10, and her second in November, Castor has yet to publish a review stating her opinion of the department’s progress.”
The article referenced the excuse given for the reports not having been completed, ” She wasn’t officially under contract until this week — a fact the city of Miami acknowledged Thursday, two months after the Miami Herald requested the document.” The article was published in December two months after it had requested your initial July report. Therefore, the excuse given by you and the city of Miami, which you were supposed to be monitoring to make sure no more black men died unnecessarily, is you weren’t actually under contract until December not April 7, 2016, the date on the only contract you signed and had notarized on 4/28/2016.
I thereafter made a public records request for a copy of the contract and noticed that someone drew a line through the month of April and hand wrote December over it, a notarized document, notarized April 28, 2016. Neither you nor the city attorney know who drew the line. You may want to call the Florida Association of Notaries, I did. I was told that modifying a notarized document without the parties either initializing/signing next to the change is a no no. The other option could have been executing a brand new agreement.
* as a sidenote, I drove down to Miami to hear your explanation to a Miami Civilian Board (it was recorded see link to my blog post, video embedded) as to when your late reports would be done and a county commissioner, Francis Suarez, was present at the meeting. I approached him and asked him if he had voted to hire you as the city’s monitor and whether he knew about the black on bike Tampa Bay Times report in 2015 that you now acknowledge was wrong….Francis Suarez told me that he had voted for you but that he did not know about the Tampa issue prior to his vote and that I could quote him on that. I blogged about this. See my blog post here. I could not understand how you were selected to monitor another police agency with issues related to deaths of civilian black men so close in time to issues you yourself had as the former chief of police in Tampa, burdening blacks without a benefit.
I texted you on May 5, 2017 (a Sunday) and wrote, “Jane-good evening- I am publishing a blog post regarding an issue related to your monitoring agreement and wanted to give you an opportunity to comment before I publish-why is there a line strike through april 7th (the seeming initial start date of your written agreement) and december written above it when that document was notarized on 4/28/2016? Seems odd especially on the heels of David Smiley’s article late last year alleging you were behind schedule on your initial report. Thanks and have a good Sunday and week.” See attached text message below Interestingly, the day of the month did not change, the 7th. What are the odds that the new start day of December is the same start day of April?
Within minutes you called me and advised that you did not know who drew the line through April and when I asked you whether your copy of the contract had the line you could not respond and said you had to look for your copy. You also advised I needed to speak with Miami’s city attorney, George Wysong, and inquire about why the start date of the contract changed to December because it had something to do with an insurance issue. I asked you if you had billed prior to December and you responded that you had and I was perplexed that you were billing for work prior to the “start” date of December even though you were giving that as an excuse for your work (reports) under the contract not being complete. I called the city attorney, George Wysong, the next day and he advised that the contract was pushed to December because the city had to make sure you were adequately insured. I then asked him how could you have been allowed to work prior to December when the insurance matter had not been resolved prior to December and it could have subjected the city of Miami to potential liability? Mr. Wysong did not have an adequate response for that neither did he know who drew the line through the month of April but that it was someone in Miami that did it. Did you give consent to anyone to tweak your signed and notarized contract?
* Please see below pdf attachments of (the referenced emails to you and Wysong and his response to me) regarding this issue. FYJ reader, all attachments are below.
Email this morning (June 15, 2018) mailed to Miami city attorney George Wysong and Jane Castor copied:
See below. Your response to my inquiry in 2017. Please see attached the 2016 monitoring agreement. You indicated that the start date in the contract was pushed to December because Risk Mgt had to clear Castor for adequate insurance requirements. However, the contract Castor signed on 4/7/2016 and had notarized 4/28/2016 ALREADY had the city’s Risk Mgt Director’s, Ann- Marie Sharpe, signature to the contract (please see page 14 of the contract) as Ms. Castor being “APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS” , please explain this SIR….
I am posting a blog piece today and publishing this email as part of the post. I will include any response you may have.
Oh by the way, this past April (2018), Ms. Castor made an admission of wrongdoing when the Tampa Police Department burdened black men without a benefit under Castor’s leadership. It was not too long after the unfortunate burdening of blacks scandal that the Tampa Bay Times wrote about in 2015, that the city of Miami hired Castor to oversee a policing agreement between the Feds and the Miami police after 7 black men were killed within the period of 8 months by Miami police. Castor made this admission a week before she announced that she was running for mayor of the city of Tampa and presumably to win the vote of the community that her agency burdened. Did you or any of the officials who made the decision to hire her in 2016 know this? Do you think that the residents of the city of Miami can have complete confidence in Castor as the chosen monitor with this in her background and when she did not have her reports completed by the due date under the attached contract that taxpayers were paying her $150.00 an hour/125k a year max? The Miami Herald in December of 2016 ran an article saying Castor was “way behind schedule” on her work under the agreement. How has Castor been doing on monitoring your agreement with the FEDS that began on 2016 and runs until 2020 seeing as Castor is currently spending her time and focused on campaigning to be mayor of Tampa? Inquiring minds want to know.
Tomorrow, a well respected Tampa Bay civil rights attorney, Michael Maddux, has been invited to Michelle Willliams’ radio show, Stay Woke. Michelle Williams is a local community activist. Maddux will be on for the full two hour show, 8am-10am. You can listen to it on http://www.n-touchnews.com/. You can hear the show by hitting the play button on the website page screen or you can also visit Ms. Williams’ facebook page, https://www.facebook.com/thetruthslanger, as she will also be livestreaming it to her over 21K followers. Ms. Jane Castor is also invited on the show to discuss the wrong done to blacks under her leadership and to hopefully address how she will now make the community that was burdened whole.
TEXT MESSAGE TO JANE MARCH 5, 2017
Comments Off on Is Jane Castor Tampa Strong or Tampa Wrong? | filed under Justice System
» posted on Tuesday, June 12th, 2018 at 8:07 pm by admin
Comments Off on “Debt-Ridden Tampa Bay Times Duping Employees, Subscribers , Advertisers, Suppliers” | filed under Justice System
» posted on Tuesday, June 12th, 2018 at 2:58 am by admin
Visit Harry Cohen Campaign Website to Learn more about his candidacy:
Comments Off on 2019 Tampa Mayoral Candidate, Harry Cohen, on Florida You Judge | filed under Justice System
» posted on Saturday, June 9th, 2018 at 10:04 pm by admin
by Jim Bleyer
Comments Off on ‘Unity’ Confab Fizzles; Cruz Campaign in Shambles | filed under Justice System
» posted on Friday, June 1st, 2018 at 10:28 pm by admin
Inquiry to Mayoral Candidate Jane Castor on Potential Civil Rights Violation Claims Against the City of Tampa
Florida You Judge.com emailed the following inquiry to Tampa mayoral candidate, Jane Castor. Should Ms. Castor have any response to the inquiry, the blog post will be updated with inclusion of Castor’s response. Mayor Bob Buckhorn was copied in the email and asked whether he would like to offer any comment.
Good afternoon Ms. Castor,
I wanted to inquire for Florida You Judge.com about the following issue:
- On April 17, 2015, the Tampa Bay Times published an article titled, “How riding your bike can land you in trouble with cops-if you’re black” The agency you formally led was charged with racially profiling black people while they rode their bikes.
- On April 23, 2015, you as Tampa’s chief of police, strongly disputed that allegation made by the Tampa Bay Times, “Jane Castor strongly disputes biking while-black story” and “Jane Castor mostly unrepentant as she goes before Tampa City Council on “biking while black” controversy.”
- On April 23, 2015, an article was published after you and Mayor Bob Buckhorn invited the Department of Justice to step in and investigate to see if maybe there was something you were missing on the racial profiling assertion, “Bike Citations in Tampa under Justice Dept microscope”
- On April 27, 2016, the DOJ concluded that TPD under your leadership, was burdening blacks without any benefit. “Federal Report: Tampa police bike tickets burden blacks, have no benefit.”
- After the DOJ submitted this report, you did not acknowledge any wrongdoing in the bike program practice nor offer an apology to the black community.
- On April 12, 2018, a week before you announced you were running for Mayor of Tampa and 3 years after assertions that your agency was burdening blacks without any public safety benefit, you told TBT that your bike program was wrong, “Carlton: Jane Castor now says biking while-black tickets were wrong”
- My inquiry is the following: Since your recent acknowledgement that in fact your bike program was wrong, is it now your position that those black persons, who were burdened and had their civil rights violated, should now seek potential legal claims against the city of Tampa? Mayor Buckhorn, I would be interested in hearing what your position is as well.
Ms. Castor, would you be interested in participating in a brief online segment on Florida You Judge in order to address this issue and speak to the black community on whether those who suffered civil rights deprivations under your former bike program should receive legal redress for harms they wrongfully suffered by the city of Tampa?
Comments Off on Inquiry to Mayoral Candidate Jane Castor on Potential Civil Rights Violation Claims Against the City of Tampa | filed under Justice System