Inquiry to Hillsborough State Attorney Andrew Warren on Who He Decides Dies or Doesn’t

Tampa Bay Times: Awaiting trial six years in Ruskin murders, ice cream man finds himself short a lawyer

A story worth following and filled with issues aplenty………the parents of the ice cream man went broke (cashed in their retirement savings) according to the article paying for private representation.  Bill: $119,384

Inquiry to Hillsborough State Attorney: Mr. Warren, What is the difference between this case and the other death penalty cases that you have recently decided to not pursue further?  “Our use of the death penalty needs to be fair, consistent, and rare.”  Andrew Warren

What is the difference between Michael Keetly (accused of murdering 2) and Angel Perez (accused of murdering 3) that you base your decision to forgo death?

Fox 13 Death penalty off table for Angel Perez 

What about the difference between Keetly and  Antwoine Noland ?

Fox 13: Rena Frazier, spokesperson for the State Attorneys Office released this statement:

“We review each capitol case thoroughly to make sure we are seeking the death penalty on the most atrocious and heinous cases, considered the worst of the worst in our society. The Noland case was not one of those cases,” Frazier said.

Disclosure: Florida You Judge blogger opposes the death penalty.

 
 
 

» Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

» archives

CLICK ON ADS TO BE DIRECTED TO WEBSITES

Ad

» Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

» Tampa Bay Criminal Defense

» Tampa Bay Criminal Defense

» DISCLAIMER

Comments or opinions expressed on the blog are those of their respective contributors only. The views expressed on this blog do not necessarily represent the views of the Committee Promoting Judicial Excellence (CPJE) or its members. The content of Florida You Judge video segments and its website is intended for general information and as a forum to allow for debate and discussion. It is not designed to provide listeners/viewers with specific professional, personal, legal, or other advice. The views expressed by the show hosts or guests are their own and shall not to be construed in any way as the opinions of Florida You Judge or its owner or construed as creating an attorney/client relationship or dispensing of legal advice. Personal perspectives and opinions expressed on the blog or video segments are presented as such. The blog's visitors read and/or use any information on the blog at their own risk. Florida You Judge makes no warranty that your use of the of the blog will be uninterrupted, timely, secure or error - free or that any information obtained by you on, through or in connection with the Florida You Judge will be accurate or reliable. Florida You Judge material and video segments are provided "AS - IS" and "as available" and Florida You Judge does not guarantee or promise any specific results from use of Florida You Judge. You are encouraged to seek professional advice for any challenges, legal or otherwise, which you may have for your specific situation.