Judge Andrews Grants Motion to Suppress: Don’t Stretch the limits of Credulity or the Constitution Officer

by Haydee Oropesa

On May 7, 2014, Judge Michael Andrews entered an order (read here) granting a motion to suppress in a drug trafficking case.   Judge Andrews heard testimony from five law enforcement witnesses, all who have for several years been assigned to St. Petersburg Police Department’s drug interdiction unit.  Attorneys Jordan Tawil and Erin Antonio worked together on challenging the legality of the search of their client’s vehicle.  Officer Brandon Bill, one of the 5 officers involved in the case, justified the search by testifying that he had smelled the odor of marijuana thus giving him probable cause to search.  Judge Andrews stated in his order that, “It stretches the limits of credulity for this court to believe that the search of the defendant’s vehicle was based upon the odor of marijuana.”  Judge Andrews went on to say that Officer Bill’s testimony was  “discredited, controverted, contradictory, and incredible.”  According to Judge Andrews, the limits of credulity would be stretched to believe that although 4 drug investigation officers with the same level of experience had direct contact with the defendant and his vehicle, only Officer Bill claimed to have smelled marijuana. Additionally, the search did not yield marijuana seeds, stems, leaves, paraphernalia, nor was the odor on or about the defendant.  Therefore, Judge Andrews found no probable cause for the search.  It appears that you can’t stretch the limits of credulity or the constitution in Judge Andrews’ courtroom.  Reaction?  FloridaYouJudge!

Judge Andrews has been awarded the Florida Supreme Court’s Distinguished Judicial Service Award and the Pinellas Education Foundation’s Unsung Hero Award.


bigstock-American-Democracy-6215809 (2)(1)

Author: admin

1 thought on “Judge Andrews Grants Motion to Suppress: Don’t Stretch the limits of Credulity or the Constitution Officer

  1. he made the right ruling pursuant to the limited information of the above facts. the leo lied under oath, through his teeth, and in the judge’s face. Andrews is not the first circuit judge to make such ruling based upon the discredited testimony of a leo.
    I will not ever forget judge marion fleming in circuit juvenile on a huge amount of marijuana and tspd case. the court refused to give sgt. *** the nose of a bloodhound (analogy used during cross 🙂 ).
    some leos believe themselves to be above the law. and above the law in so many different ways. if there’s ever an opportunity to let it be known that their lies will get them nowhere – it’s with a circuit judge on a suppression motion 🙂

Comments are closed.