November 2016 (2nd DCA Appeal Opinions) for 6th and 13th Florida Circuits

PINELLAS/PASCO (6th Circuit)

Judge Jack R. St. Arnold, affirmed and reversed on one issue, ZURRO v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

Judge Pamela A.M. Campbell, reversedState Farm v. Bailey and Finnegan

Judge Phillip J. Federico, reversed, Perreault v. State

Judges Jack Day and Amy Williams,  Affirmed; remanded with instructions, BOULDER VENTURE SOUTH v. SABOW

Judge Alicia Polk, reversedOCWEN LOAN SERVICING v. OSMUNDSEN

Judge Mary Handsel, affirmedState v. Tumlinson

Judge Patrice W. Moore, reversed, F.C. v. State

Judge Thane Covert, reversed, Heare v. State

Judge  Susan L. Barthle, reversed, McKAY v. McELHINEY

Judge J. Thomas McGrady, Affirmed; remanded with directions Marin v. State

HILLSBOROUGH (13th Circuit)

Judges Caroline J. Tesche and Thomas Barber, affirmed, Lavender v. State of Florida

Judge Vivian Corvo, affirmed, Florida v. Jones

Judge William Fuente, affirmed, Williams v. State

Judge Elizabeth Rice, reversed, David Gee, Hillsborough County Sheriff v. Grantland and Cantrell

Judge Gregory Holder, affirmed and reversed on one issue, Austin v. State

Judge Mark D. Kiser, affirmed,  Shelton v. Bank of New York Mellon

Judge Charles Bergmann, reversed, 743 MAHONE v. MDC 5

Judge Martha Cook, reversed, ANDUJAR-RUIZ v. State

Judge Ralph C. Stoddard, affirmed in part; reversed in part,  J.C. v. State

Judge Barbara Twine-Thomas, affirmed in part, reversed in partC.W. v. State


» Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

» archives



» Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

» Tampa Bay Criminal Defense

» Tampa Bay Criminal Defense


Comments or opinions expressed on the blog are those of their respective contributors only. The views expressed on this blog do not necessarily represent the views of the Committee Promoting Judicial Excellence (CPJE) or its members. The content of Florida You Judge video segments and its website is intended for general information and as a forum to allow for debate and discussion. It is not designed to provide listeners/viewers with specific professional, personal, legal, or other advice. The views expressed by the show hosts or guests are their own and shall not to be construed in any way as the opinions of Florida You Judge or its owner or construed as creating an attorney/client relationship or dispensing of legal advice. Personal perspectives and opinions expressed on the blog or video segments are presented as such. The blog's visitors read and/or use any information on the blog at their own risk. Florida You Judge makes no warranty that your use of the of the blog will be uninterrupted, timely, secure or error - free or that any information obtained by you on, through or in connection with the Florida You Judge will be accurate or reliable. Florida You Judge material and video segments are provided "AS - IS" and "as available" and Florida You Judge does not guarantee or promise any specific results from use of Florida You Judge. You are encouraged to seek professional advice for any challenges, legal or otherwise, which you may have for your specific situation.