Pinellas Circuit Judge Michael Andrews Strikes States Intent to Seek Death then Rescinds Initial Order, In Part

On January 22, 2016 Pinellas Circuit Judge Michael Andrews struck the State Attorney’s office intent of seeking the death penalty in the case of Steven Cecil Dykes.  Judge Michael Andrews Order Striking State’s Intent to Seek Death. The State Attorney’s office then filed a motion to reconsider Judge Andrews’ ruling.  Yesterday, the Miami Herald reported:

“In Pinellas, Circuit Judge Michael Andrews ruled last month that the state could not seek the death penalty in the case of Steven Cecil Dykes, a Pinellas Park father accused of killing his infant daughter. Andrews reasoned at the time: “There currently exists no death penalty in the state of Florida in that there is no procedure in place.”

Last week, Andrews rescinded his order after the state challenged his initial decision, and Dykes’ trial is scheduled to begin Feb. 29.”

However, Judge Andrews did not do a full 180 on his initial ruling.  Judge Andrews’s subsequent order rescinding in part, rescinds in striking the State’s intent on seeking death BUT the court will not death qualify the jury at the start of the jury trial (2/29/2016) unless Florida’s legislature fixes its death penalty sentencing scheme held unconstitutional by SCOTUS in Hurst v. State of Florida.  Defense attorneys threw a monkey wrench into the criminal justice machine by demanding speedy trial.  Judge Michael Andrews’ order reads:

“the court will not attempt to death qualify the jury in this cause unless there is a procedure in place prior to the start of the trial”  Judge Michael Andrews Order Rescinding In Part

Here are the current legislative death sentence bills currently being considered.  Senate Bills (require unanimity in jury death recommendation) SB 7068 and SB 330.  House Bills, HB 157 (requires unanimity in jury death recommendation) and HB 7101 (requires at least 10 jurors recommending death out of 12)

According to the Miami Herald article, Rep. Charles McBurney, a Jacksonville Republican, brokered the current HB 7101 compromise of 10/2.

Fl Rep Darryl Rouson

Fl Rep Darryl Rouson

 

Rep. Darryl Rouson, D-St. Petersburg is quoted in the article citing Florida as leading the nation in 26 cases in which defendants sentenced to death were later exonerated.  Polk’s Public Defender, Rex Dimmig is also referenced in the article stating that to require unanimity in the guilt phase but not in the penalty phase is “illogical.”  “Lawmakers strike political compromise to fix Florida’s death penalty law” by Steve Bousquet

Should a death recommendation by a Florida jury be unanimous or by a 10/2 split?  Florida You Judge!

 

 

 
 
 

» Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

» archives

CLICK ON ADS TO BE DIRECTED TO WEBSITES

Ad

» Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

» Tampa Bay Criminal Defense

» Tampa Bay Criminal Defense

» DISCLAIMER

Comments or opinions expressed on the blog are those of their respective contributors only. The views expressed on this blog do not necessarily represent the views of the Committee Promoting Judicial Excellence (CPJE) or its members. The content of Florida You Judge video segments and its website is intended for general information and as a forum to allow for debate and discussion. It is not designed to provide listeners/viewers with specific professional, personal, legal, or other advice. The views expressed by the show hosts or guests are their own and shall not to be construed in any way as the opinions of Florida You Judge or its owner or construed as creating an attorney/client relationship or dispensing of legal advice. Personal perspectives and opinions expressed on the blog or video segments are presented as such. The blog's visitors read and/or use any information on the blog at their own risk. Florida You Judge makes no warranty that your use of the of the blog will be uninterrupted, timely, secure or error - free or that any information obtained by you on, through or in connection with the Florida You Judge will be accurate or reliable. Florida You Judge material and video segments are provided "AS - IS" and "as available" and Florida You Judge does not guarantee or promise any specific results from use of Florida You Judge. You are encouraged to seek professional advice for any challenges, legal or otherwise, which you may have for your specific situation.